roberta fallon and
libby rosof's

artblog


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Tuesday, November 04, 2003

Surveillance and the "p" words--porn, politics and prurience

 
Post from Brian Wallace

Mark Shetabi's observation (about the prominence of surveillance as a topic) is correct (see Nov. 4, 9:41 a.m. post), but I'd be interested to know why he thinks it's true.

I, naturally, have an opinion: to me, it's a way to address semi-perennial "issues" such as the body, pornography, and politics while seeming (and in some cases being) fresh (and, er, without getting labelled as prurient).

I brought Surveillance Camera Players to Cambridge/Boston last spring as one part of a conference on digital art and public space [ed. note: Digital Art and Public Space: Expanding Definitions of Public Art], and their performance was pretty provocative (shown right, above, SCP's map of surveillance cameras in Times Square area; shown left, image from an SCP performance).

Their tapes are interesting as documentation, but participating in a critical (literally, a finger-pointing) tour of a populated streetscape is very engaging...putting your body into a politically active mode for the delectation of some anonymous viewer...why, it's those issues of the body, pornography, and politics again.

--Brian Wallace is the director of exhibitions at Moore College of Art

Comments? Let us know.